Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Finally – Doing Something About Late Trains

Two years ago, my wife and I were on Amtrak’s Coast Starlight traveling from Seattle to Los Angeles. The scheduled arrival time in Los Angeles is 9:00 p.m., but we were running late. Seven hours late! We would get to LA at 4:00 in the morning, then sit around drinking coffee all day until our afternoon flight back to Maui. Instead, we elected to leave the train in Santa Barbara at just after 1:00 a.m., spend the night in a hotel there, sleep in the next day, then rent a car and drive straight to LAX. The change of plans cost us $400.

The thing is, this mess wasn’t Amtrak’s fault. The Coast Starlight, you see, operates on tracks owned and controlled by the Union Pacific Railroad and over and over again, UP dispatchers gave priority to their freight trains and made us wait on sidings.

Furthermore, it’s not just the Coast Starlight that’s affected. With the exception of the Northeast Corridor between Washington, DC, and Boston, almost all Amtrak trains operating throughout the country run on track owned by the major freight railroads. And delays are the rule, not the exception. Imagine the inconvenience and cost to millions of Amtrak passengers!

But thanks to Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), we now have a good idea what all these delays are costing Amtrak. The Senator asked for an investigation by the Transportation Department and the report, hot off the presses, has given us the answer: For the fiscal year 2006, all these delays cost Amtrak ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN MILLION DOLLARS! That’s for overtime, extra fuel, and lost revenue. And, since Amtrak gets an annual subsidy from the federal government, about a third of that money was generously provided by us taxpayers.

But here’s the kicker: By federal law, the freight railroads are required to give priority to Amtrak trains. Obviously, the law is being ignored, yet the U.S. Attorney General has never – not once – pursued a single case against any of the freight railroads.

Let me end this post on a positive note, however. My unofficial check seems to indicate that things are improving and, in fact, some long-distance trains often appear to be running close to on-time.

Do you suppose that has something to do with the fact that Senator Lautenberg has sponsored new legislation that, among other things, would whack the freight railroads with big fines for delaying passenger trains? Of course not!


2 comments:

Kevin Love said...

Via Rail gives a travel credit for the next ticket if their train is late. For example, in the Windsor-Toronto-Montreal-Quebec City corridor, if the train is one hour late, the next trip is 50% off. Four hours late and the next trip is 100% off (ie free).

Details at:
http://www.viarail.ca/planner/en_plan_aide_reta.html

I support legislation requiring Amtrak to do this same thing, with that legislation requiring all costs of delays due to a host freight railway to be paid by that railway company.

If the freight railway companies have to pay for the costs of the delays, I would wager that the trains will suddenly start to run on time.

JIM LOOMIS said...

No way I'll take that bet!

I didn't know about the VIA policy. I've taken quite a few VIA trips and have been very impressed.

Thanks for the comment.